Eswatini’s economy expanded by 4.8% in real terms in 2025, but gross capital formation contracted by 18.2%, exposing a sharp divergence between headline economic growth and the pace of investment. While private consumption increased by 2.9%, the decline in capital formation points to weaker investment activity and raises questions about whether the current expansion is translating into sufficient additions to the country’s productive capacity.
Article
Eswatini’s economy expanded by 4.8% in real terms in 2025, but the headline growth figure was accompanied by a sharp contraction in investment, with gross capital formation falling by 18.2% in real terms.
The divergence is significant for the structure of the economy. Gross capital formation covers expenditure associated with adding to the productive asset base of an economy, including investment in buildings, machinery, equipment, and other fixed assets. A sustained decline in this area can have implications for future production, business expansion, and the economy’s ability to generate higher levels of income.
According to the Central Statistical Office’s 2025 Annual Gross Domestic Product Bulletin, real GDP increased from E72.251 billion in 2024 to E75.749 billion in 2025. Over the same period, real gross capital formation fell from E10.325 billion to E8.443 billion. The figures show that economic output expanded even as the volume of investment contracted substantially.
The decline in capital formation also reduced the share of investment in the economy. Gross capital formation accounted for 12.4% of GDP at current prices in 2025, while private consumption represented 63.5% of GDP. This composition highlights the considerable weight of household spending in economic activity relative to investment expenditure.
Private consumption increased by 2.9% in real terms during the year, providing continued support to domestic demand. Government consumption, by comparison, declined marginally by 0.1%, while government capital formation contracted by 1.5%. The data, therefore, points to a year in which consumption remained relatively resilient while overall capital formation weakened.
For businesses and financial institutions, the distinction between consumption-led activity and investment-led expansion is important. Consumer spending can support turnover across sectors such as retail and services, but investment is what expands the capacity of businesses to produce, distribute, and provide goods and services in the future.
The 2025 figures show that wholesale and retail trade remained one of the largest parts of the economy, contributing 15.5% of GDP, while manufacturing accounted for 28.8%, making it the largest industry by share. Agriculture, forestry, and fishing accounted for 7.0%, while public administration and defense contributed 8.0%.
Several sectors, nevertheless, recorded strong real growth during the year. Construction expanded by 11.8%, wholesale and retail trade grew by 6.1%, and professional, scientific, and technical activities increased by 11.7%, while information and communication recorded the strongest growth among the major sectors at 20.5%. Financial services, excluding insurance, grew by 5.6%.
The performance of construction is particularly notable because the sector is closely associated with fixed investment and economic activity. Its 11.8% real growth indicates increased activity within the sector, although construction represented only 3.1% of the GDP in 2025. The strong sectoral growth, therefore, did not prevent the wider economy from recording a substantial decline in gross capital formation.
The information and communication sector presents another important contrast. Real output in the sector increased by 20.5% in 2025, although it represented only 1.2% of GDP. Its relatively small economic base means that even strong growth in the sector has a limited effect on the overall size of the economy. Nevertheless, its performance points to areas where investment and technological development could potentially support future economic expansion.
The broader expenditure figures reinforce the investment concern. Gross capital formation declined by 18.2% in real terms, while exports increased by 4.8% and imports rose by 6.1%. Services exports recorded particularly strong growth of 24.4%, compared with a 27.8% increase in services imports.
The figures do not, on their own, establish why investment declined, nor do they show that the 4.8% GDP expansion is necessarily unsustainable. They do, however, identify a structural issue that deserves closer attention: the economy recorded stronger output alongside a substantial reduction in the volume of capital formation.
For the financial sector, these matter because investment creates demand for financing. Companies expanding factories, purchasing equipment, developing commercial property, or investing in technology typically require some combination of bank credit, equity, retained earnings, or institutional capital. A prolonged period of weak capital formation could, therefore, affect the pipeline of productive projects seeking finance.
At the same time, the figures present a potential opportunity for capital providers if viable projects can be identified and supported. The challenge is not simply to increase the amount of money entering the economy, but to ensure that financing is directed towards investments capable of raising productivity, expanding production, improving competitiveness, and generating sustainable cash flows.
This is particularly relevant for an economy where manufacturing remains the largest contributor to GDP. Investment in productive equipment, technology, logistics, and industrial capacity can influence the ability of manufacturers to expand output and compete in regional markets. The same principle applies to agriculture, construction, ICT, and other sectors, where additional capital can increase productive capacity.
The 2025 national accounts therefore warrant a closer reading than the headline 4.8% growth rate alone. Eswatini recorded a solid expansion in real output, but the 18.2% contraction in gross capital formation indicates that the investment component of the economy moved in the opposite direction. Private consumption grew while the economy’s measured investment base became smaller in real terms.
For policymakers, investors, and financial institutions, the key issue going forward will be whether the country can strengthen the link between economic growth and capital accumulation. Growth that is accompanied by rising productive investment is more likely to expand the economy’s capacity to generate output, employment, and future income.
The 2025 data does not provide a final verdict on the quality of Eswatini’s economic growth. It does, however, provide a clear financial signal: the country grew by 4.8%, while real investment fell by 18.2%. Understanding that gap will be critical to assessing whether the current expansion can translate into a stronger and more productive investment cycle.
Other Articles
