By: Nkosiyabusa Nsibande
Eswatini’s external trade position improved in August 2026, with the country posting a merchandise trade surplus of E194.1 million, compared with a deficit of E261.9 million recorded in August 2025. The shift represents a net swing of roughly E456 million over a twelve-month period, according to figures released by the Eswatini Revenue Service (ERS), the authority responsible for compiling and publishing the country’s monthly trade statistics.
The data is drawn from ERS’s Merchandise Trade Report for August 2026, a monthly publication that tracks the value of goods traded between Eswatini and its international partners, disaggregated by trading bloc, geographic region, and product category under the internationally recognized Harmonized System (HS) of classification. The report serves as one of the more timely indicators available of the state of the country’s external accounts, a matter of particular consequence for Eswatini given its status as a small, open economy whose currency, the Lilangeni, is pegged to the South African Rand within the Common Monetary Area. Movements in the trade balance have direct implications for foreign reserve levels and for revenue collected through the Southern African Customs Union (SACU) common revenue pool, from which Eswatini derives a substantial share of government income.
According to the ERS report, the improvement in the trade balance was driven by movement on both sides of the ledger. Exports increased to E3.86 billion in August 2026, up E331.4 million, or 9.38%, from the E3.53 billion recorded in August 2025. Imports, by contrast, declined to E3.67 billion, down E124.6 million, or 3.28%, from E3.80 billion a year earlier. The surplus also marks a substantial improvement on the preceding month, with ERS data showing a revised deficit of E253.7 million for July 2026. A trade balance that improves on both the export and import side within the same reporting period is generally regarded by economists as a favorable, if not necessarily conclusive, indicator, since such movements can reflect underlying gains in competitiveness or, alternatively, temporary factors such as commodity price fluctuations, exchange rate effects, or the timing of shipments across the monthly reporting boundary.

The report attributes the bulk of export growth to a small number of product categories. Chemicals and allied industry products, classified under HS Section VI, generated E1.57 billion in export revenue in August, an increase of E233 million, or 17.45%, year-on-year, and accounted for approximately 40% of total exports for the month. This represents a notable shift in the composition of Eswatini’s export base, which has historically been associated more closely with textiles and processed agricultural goods than with industrial chemical output. Mineral products, while a smaller category in absolute terms at E93.4 million, recorded the largest percentage increase of any major export line, rising 92.41% year-on-year. Prepared foodstuffs, beverages, and tobacco products, the single largest export category by value at E1.21 billion, grew by a comparatively modest 3.33%, indicating that August’s export growth was concentrated in specific sectors rather than broadly distributed across the export basket.
Regional trade data included in the report suggests that demand from within the Southern African Customs Union played a disproportionate role in driving the export increase. Exports to SACU member states rose 15.25% year-on-year to E2.83 billion, outpacing the 9.38% growth rate recorded for exports to the world as a whole. The disparity between regional and global export growth rates points to intra-regional demand, rather than a broader repricing of Eswatini’s export goods on international markets, as the more significant contributor to the month’s performance.

On the import side, the ERS report identifies mineral products and chemical or allied industry products as the two largest contributors to the year-on-year decline, falling by E77 million (8.86%) and E31.2 million (5.71%) respectively. Both categories are closely linked to global commodity price movements, raising the possibility that a portion of the import contraction reflects lower international input costs rather than a deliberate reduction in demand for foreign goods among domestic consumers and industry. This distinction is material for interpretation: a trade surplus attributable to falling import costs carries different implications for the domestic economy than one driven by import substitution or a structural decline in import dependence.
Notwithstanding the positive monthly figure, the report’s cumulative fiscal-year data indicates that Eswatini’s trade position remains in deficit on a year-to-date basis. For the period April to August of the 2026/27 fiscal year, ERS recorded a cumulative trade deficit of E878.4 million, an improvement on the E1.02 billion deficit recorded over the same period in the prior fiscal year, but a deficit nonetheless. Cumulative exports for the fiscal year to date stand at E18.24 billion, up 6.69% year-on-year, while cumulative imports total E19.12 billion, up 5.56%. The August surplus should therefore be read within the context of a fiscal year that, in aggregate, continues to run a substantial shortfall.

Whether the August figures represent the beginning of a sustained improvement in Eswatini’s trade position, or a favorable single-month result within a longer-term pattern of narrowing but persistent deficits cannot be determined from one report alone. Subsequent monthly releases from ERS will be necessary to establish whether the trend observed in August continues into the remainder of the 2026/27 fiscal year.
It should also be noted that the figures for August 2026 are classified by ERS as preliminary, while the July 2026 figures cited for comparison are revised. Trade statistics of this nature are routinely subject to further revision as customs data is finalized, a standard caveat that should inform any assessment of the underlying trend ahead of confirmation in subsequent reporting periods.